Friday, June 28, 2019
Climate Change causes illegal entry of Central Americans into the USA
Friday, June 21, 2019
- "Hello, I'm Kathy Castor and I chair the House Select Committee on The Climate Crisis.
- Climate Scientists are asking us to do something very simple today and I want to tell you how you can participate.
- These are the warming stripes. Each line represents one year of global temperature data from 1850-2018. These stripes have become a powerful symbol because they make our climate crisis so clear. (FIGURE 1)
- And this year our House Select Committee on the Climate Crisis became the first government body to use the warming stripes in our logo.
- I love it when our colleagues ask us what the stripes mean. It's a great way to start a conversation about what we're doing to solve the climate crisis.
- Now scientists have made it easy for you to picture what global warming looks like in your backyard so you can start your own conversation. For example, these are the warming stripes from my home state of Florida. (FIGURE 2). Every place is different and we're all affected by the climate crisis.
- So go to ShowYourStripes dot info and find your warming stripes. Then start a conversation. Post them to social media with the hashtag "Show Your Stripes".
- Because no matter where we live, we're all in this together.
- RELATED POST ON ACTIVISM IN CLIMATE SCIENCE: [LINK]
Monday, June 17, 2019
- In presenting the history of securities regulation we examine the rise of credit and equity financing in pre-industrial Europe and trace the evolution of regulation from the Bubble Act of 1720 through the market break of 1929 and the formation of the SEC, to the present day issues with regard to financial innovations, computerization of trading, globalization of capital markets and operational risks in emerging markets.
- Modern finance theory is wanting a coherent theory of regulation. Scholarly work on the theory of regulation forwarded by Bennett, Bentson, Friend, Kripke, Loss, Mann, Merton Miller, Rosen, Seligman, Stigler, and others during a 30-year period (1964 to 1994) address different aspects of regulation and their theories are in conflict.
- Much of the theoretical debate has been in the form of for and against regulation. For example, Stigler and his supporters are against regulation because, they argue, disclosure requirements impose unnecessary costs on corporations. According to this view, "disclosure increases share prices" and since managers pay is tied to firm performance it is in the self interest of managers to disclose anyway without the need for externally imposed regulation. Friend and others dispute this view and argue for regulation. They contend that "it is precisely because" of the managers self-interest in high share prices that he is likely to withhold adverse information or exaggerate positive information. Similar debates (for or against) exist for other forms of regulation such as anti-trust laws, the control of insider trades and SEC rules concerning the behavior of brokers, the operation of exchanges and new issue offereings by corporations.
- The purpose of regulation itself is embroiled in controversy. Why does securities regulation exist? Is it to protect the individual investor? from whom? Or is it to preserve capital markets? Or to assist corporations in raising capital? In our analysis we consider all forms of regulation including uniform accounting methods, NASD and exchange internal regulations, and externally imposed regulation by legislation and we argue that regulation exists for all of these reasons. We support the argument by building a coherent model of regulation using the cost of capital to corporations in the aggregate economy as the operational variable. We then define a term called the `agency cost of capital formation and show that regulation influences the cost of capital (and therefore the wealth of the economy) by acting through this variable. Rather than argue for or against regulation our theoretical model sets the framework for an optimal level of regulation.
- We contend that the agency cost of capital formation is a significant portion of the cost of capital to corporations. A well designed regulatory structure is necessary to reach an optimal balance between monitoring costs imposed by regulation and the reduction in agency costs achieved by regulation. In the absence of regulation, wealth transfers between shareholder, debtholders, and management may occur that drive investors from the market; and prices are not optimal and do not allocate capital efficiently. Because of the added risk investors demand additional returns. The result is an increased cost of capital to corporations, and less overall investment in productive assets. Excessive and inappropriate regulation are associated with high monitoring costs to corporations because they limit the ability of the market to attract new capital, to provide liquidity to investors, or to allow corporations to utilize the market to finance new projects.
Thursday, June 13, 2019
FOUND IN ACTUAL HOSPITAL RECORDS
Patient has chest pain if she lies on her left side for over a year.
Friday, April 23, 2010

Sunday, April 18, 2010

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Global warming scientists have come up with the bizarre idea that carbon dioxide causes volcanic eruptions in Iceland. The argument goes that carbon dioxide emissions cause global warming, global warming in turn causes glaciers in Iceland to melt, and melting glaciers lighten the weight of the ice cap on volcanoes and thereby trigger eruptions (Ice cap thaw may awaken Icelandic volcanoes, April 17, 2010).
Cha-am Jamal
Wednesday, April 14, 2010




Wednesday, April 07, 2010

Thursday, April 01, 2010

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Wednesday, March 24, 2010

Monday, February 22, 2010
Friday, January 22, 2010
Reference: Meeting Copenhagen's challenge, Bangkok Post, January 22, 2010
Such is the wily power of bureaucratic double-speak that it can paint the failed climate meeting in Copenhagen as a great success; and a document called an "Accord" only because no signatory would accept the word "Treaty", as a positive outcome (Meeting Copenhagen's challenge, Bangkok Post, January 22, 2010). The global warming movement and the whole of the allegedly scientific case against carbon dioxide are based on exactly this kind of word magic that always leads to the same conclusions whatever the data.
Cha-am Jamal
Thailand
Wednesday, January 20, 2010
Refereence: Coal remains king in China despite climate change vow, Bangkok Post, January 20, 2010
The inability of the envornmentalists to separate pollution issues from global warming will surely adversely affect their effectiveness.
INDIGENOUS PEOPLES
Posted by: chaamjamal on: January 2, 2022
THIS POST IS A STUDY OF THE CONTRADICTIONS IN THE SACREDNESS OF BEING INDIGENOUS
WHEN THE EUROPEANS DEVELOPED THE TECHNOLOGY FOR CELESTIAL NAVIGATION AND OCEAN CROSSING SHIPS AND BEGAN TO EXPLORE THE WORLD THEY FOUND AND SETTLED PRIMITIVE UNDEVELOPED REGIONS WITH SPARSE POPULATIONS SUCH AS THE AMERICAS. THE PEOPLE THEY FOUND THERE ARE DESCRIBED AS “THE PEOPLE THAT WE FOUND HERE WHEN WE ARRIVED” OR IN SPANISH “INDIGENOUS”, PRONOUNCED {IN THEE HAY NUSS}.
OVER THE YEARS, IN A WEIRD TWIST OF ENVIRONMENTALISM AND RACISM THE WORD INDIGENOUS HAS BECOME SACRED AND SOME KIND OF RELIGION WHERE THE EUROPEAN SETTLERS ARE NOW IN CHARGE NOT OF HELPING THESE PEOPLE TO DEVELOP ALONG THE LINE OF EUROPEAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BUT OF PRESERVING THE PRIMITIVE CULTURE AND LIFESTYLE OF THESE PEOPLE.
OF THE MANY CONTRADICTIONS IN THIS SACREDNESS THE MOST CRUEL AND RACIST IS THAT THOUGH THE ADVANCED EUROPEAN RACES ARE ABLE TO PROVIDE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE TO THE PRIMITIVE PEOPLES OF OTHER COUNTRIES {SEE LIST AND MAP BELOW}, TO ENLIGHTEN AND ENRICH THEM WITH EUROPEAN METHODS AND TECHNOLOGY, THAT KIND OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT POSSIBLE IF THE PRIMITIVE PEOPLE ARE THE ONES THE EUROPEANS FOUND IN THE NEW LANDS THAT THEY SETTLED. THE SPANISH WORD “INDIGENOUS” HAS TAKEN ON SUCH AN AURA OF SACREDNESS AND ENVIRONMENTALISM THAT IT PREVENTS THE EUROPEANS FROM PROVIDING DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE TO THESE PEOPLE IN THE SAME WAY THAT THEY PROVIDE DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE TO PRIMITIVE PEOPLE ELSEWHERE.
BELOW WE PROVIDE A LIST OF COUNTRIES WITH PRIMITIVE PEOPLE WHOM THE EUROPEANS HAVE HELPED OR ARE CURRENTLY HELPING TO RISE UP TO THE EUROPEAN STANDARD OF LIVING BY PROVIDING THEM WITH DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE ALONG WITH EUROPEAN TECHNOLOGY AND VALUES AS WELL AS THINGS LIKE EDUCATION AND UNIVERSITIES. MANY OF THESE COUNTRIES HAVE MADE SIGNIFICANT ADVANCES WITH INDUSTRY AND TECHNOLOGY ASSISTANCE PROVIDED BY THE GLOBAL NORTH. FOR EXAMPLE, BANGLADESH, ONCE A COUNTRY OF RICE FIELDS AND PRIMITIVE FISHERMEN ON ROW BOATS IS NOW A SIGNIFICANT MANUFACTURER OF SHIPS.
Burundi, Somalia, Mozambique, Madagascar, Sierra Leone, Afghanistan, Central African Republic, Liberia, Niger, Democratic Republic of the Congo, and Bangladesh AND SO ON SHOWN IN THE MAP BELOW WHERE THE REDDER THE COUNTRY THE RICHER IT IS AND THE DARKER THE COUNTRY THE POORER IT IS.

THE PHRASE “WE FOUND THEM HERE WHEN WE ARRIVED” TAKES ON SACRED ENVIRONMENTALISM AND RACISM VALUES WHEN IT IS TRANSLATED INTO SPANISH AND THIS RELIGION OBLIGATES THE EUROPEAN SETTLERS TO KEEP THESE PROPLE PRIMITIVE SO THEY CAN WORSHIP THEIR PRIMITIVENESS.
I SHOULD ADD THAT THE EUROPEANS TOO ARE INDIGENOUS. THEY ARE INDIGENOUS TO EUROPE. EVERYONE ON EARTH IS INDIGENOUS TO SOMEWHERE – THE PLACE WHERE THEY WERE BORN AND RFAISED. BUT FOR SETTLERS OF NEW LANDS, THE WORD HAS MAGICAL POWERS.

THIS RACIST CONTRADICTION IS ALSO FOUND IN TRADITIONAL MAINLINE SEEMINGLY ANTI RACIST MOVEMENTS THAT ARE THEMSELVES MORE RACIST THAN THE RACISM THEY APPEAR TO BE OPPOSE. AS FOR EXAMPLE, THE NOW FAMOUS SONG THAT “THE ANSWER MY FRIEND IS BLOWING IN THE WIND, THE ANSWER IS BLOWING IN THE WIND.

IN ALL SUCH CASES, THE ESSENCE OF THE HYPOTHESIS IS THAT THE WHITE MAN IS THE CARETAKER OF THE LESSER HUMANS. IT IS THE RACISM OF THE RACISM OF THE RACISM BUT IT SOUNDS GOOD BECAUSE THE WHITE MAN SAYS HE WILL TAKE CARE OF THE LESSER HUMANS.









