Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Reference: A climate of disease, Bangkok Post, May 20, 2009

Funding has of course always determined to some extent the subject of scientific research but not until the global warming hype have we witnessed the complete corruption of science; for funding now determines not only the research questions to ask but the correct answers to those questions to which the research should lead (A climate of disease, Bangkok Post, May 20, 2009). Clearly, the exercise by epidemiologists to pin a malarial holocaust on global warming is not unbiased scientific inquiry but an effort to fudge the data and the methodology until the findings meet the expectations and the utility of the global warming community and thereby facilitate further funding. 

Cha-am Jamal

1 comment:

CPMJohn said...

and many holding that global warming agenda are using it to gain "governement" (their) control of private industry.