THE GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CRISES OF THE UN
Posted on: March 18, 2020
Christiana Figueres: Well, that is, ironically, of course, the other side of this right? It may be good for climate. But I think because there is less trade, there’s less travel, there’s less commerce. Expect more disease outbreaks if we continue to deny, delude and delay on climate change. If we continue to eat animals, we will be poisoning ourselves and being the genesis of new diseases we have not seen before.
RELATED POSTS ON THE RISE OF THE UN AS GLOBAL EPA
- THE CLIMATE MOVEMENT FROM CALLENDAR TO GRETA
- AN UNCONSTRAINED BUREAUCRACY
- SDG: SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT GOALS
- THE IPCC IS AN AGENCY OF THE UN
- THE WMO IS AN AGENCY OF THE UN
- THE FAUX OZONE CRISIS AND THE BIRTH OF UN AS GLOBAL EPA
Remember when the ILO did labor, the FAO did agriculture, the WHO did health, the World Bank did infrastructure loans for developing countries, the WMO did Meteorology, and the UNDP did economic development of poor countries? Now they all do Climate. This post is an examination of this anomaly in terms of the structure and function of the UN that are not constrained and that contain no provision for accountability, oversight, discipline, or budgetary constraint. These structural flaws have created a rogue public service organization that serves itself and not the public and they make it possible for the UN to use its self declared global environmental authority to invent global environmental crises that inflate its budget and serve its bureaucratic needs.
That the World Health Organization (WHO) is busy with climate change these days with predictions that climate change is causing starvation and malnutrition, is best understood in this context. The WHO is no longer a World Health Organization but an agency of the UN that takes its orders from Antonio Guterres the climate guy.
No comments:
Post a Comment